Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Theory of Human Development Essay Example For Students
 Theory of Human Development Essay  What makes a person what they are? Why does  a person do what they do? Where does personality come from and how does  it grow? These are some frequently asked questions when discussing the  topic of personality. The latter of the questions is actually an answer  in itself. Personality does originate from a specific point, and from  then on it continues to grow and become exponentially more complex. This  core point from which personality begins and the growth of it will be  discussed in the sections to follow, but first we must look at certain  assumptions that are commonly made when developing a personality theory.  Assumptions The first of these assumptions concerns whether one believes  that the behaviors, any type of action, a person exhibits are produced  by conscious choices and decisions, also known as free will, or  determined by forces beyond ones control.      We will write a custom essay on Theory of Human Development  specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page    Order now   I believe in the free will  explanation, but not the type of free will commonly imagined. Humans do  ultimately have the power to choose their actions, however the extreme  influence of other factors, such as heredity, environment, and learned  behaviors, may make it seem like a persons actions were predetermined.  For example, if a starving people were put into positions where they  could either eat a Subway turkey round placed in front of them or just  sit there and stare and stare at it, common sense shows that these  people would eat. However, it is possible that one person, like an  anorexic, would just sit and stare at the sandwich. For that reason, it  can be assumed that human beings do have free will, however the choices  made are greatly impacted and seemingly determined by inherited basic  needs, environment, and learned behaviors. This leads us into a second  assumption, rationalism or irrationalism.   Do human beings operate  primarily on the basis of intellect, or on the basis of impulses and  passions? The answer is the latter theory. Going back to the Subway  example, the most likely decision on whether or not to eat the turkey  round would be based on an irrational impulse in ones subconscious. The  basic physiological need of food has a profound influence on the given  choice. But note that this is only the most likely response and not a  definite one. There is always the chance that a person could make a  conscious, rational decision not to eat. Because a people ultimately do  have some sort of a conscious decision over their actions, it cannot be  assumed that behavior is solely determined by irrational impulses.   The  next assumption to be dealt with is one of the most argued and  controversial of them all. Is human nature basically good or inherently  evil? Naturally, most optimists would argue that people are born with a  good nature, while other people of another persuasion would take on the  opinion of an essentially evil disposition. However, human nature is a  term that should neither be associated with good nor evil. In contrast,  human nature is based upon inherited basic needs, environment, and  learned behaviors, not morality, which is itself a learned behavior. An  example of this would be murder. In most societies today, it is  considered wrong, or evil, to commit an act of homicide if you kill a  person because, for the sake of argument, they were walking too close to  your home.   However, thousands of years ago it may have been a part of  life to kill someone intruding near ones dwelling, looked upon as a  display of territorial protection. Morality, the virtues of good and  evil, are completely dependent on the social group from which you have  adopted most of your learned behaviors. Therefore, good and evil are  nonexistent and should be looked upon as terms of social acceptability.  The final assumption to be examined is normally a difficult one to  address if one is trying to make a definite choice. It is the question  of environment versus heredity. B.   .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b , .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b .postImageUrl , .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b , .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b:hover , .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b:visited , .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b:active { border:0!important; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b:active , .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative   ; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left   : 18px; top: 0; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0489fea0c134964e45038fdd3a26ed0b:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Oranges are not the only fruit EssayF. Skinner would argue faithfully that  behavior is based solely on environmental contingencies, while Sigmund  Freud would just as strongly maintain that the role of heredity  determines the personality of an individual. I, on the other hand,  believe that both sides of the .    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.